YOU REALLY HAVE TO WONDER???

I was holding back on this information in order to use it in relation to my PRRs, however this SR story somewhat forces me to write about it today.

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2016/jan/13/records-advocate-wants-all-spokane-police-body-cam/

Let me start by advising you that the emails I am providing below were readily available to the reporter who wrote the above story. I obtained the emails as a result of my PRR and it is a copy of the same disc that was provided to Nick Deshairs of the Spokesman Review, so unless reporters don’t share information one has to wonder why the SR isn’t using the information they have available to them.

The emails demonstrate that a meeting took place on 6/25/2015 between several individuals within the City regarding Public Records Requests, as you can see a plan was afoot to move SPD Records personell to City hall to deal with records requests and there is discussion about where to house them and costs. What any investigative reporter would notice immediately is that the original July 1st,2015 email by Terri Pfister was not provided in the released public records documents and contains attachments regarding what took place at the 6/25/2015 meeting regarding PRRs. Pfister’s email is however copied in the other emails.

So exactly what do the attachments contain and what were the City’s plans? Keep in mind that this meeting took place prior to the Cotton/Straub case being made public.

July 1 708

July 21

One of the many compeling reasons I, and other media (yes other media) are questioning the Spokesman Review’s coverage of the Condon Administration is their reasoning behind not reporting on the text messages I obtained, via my PRR and offered to them, between Angie Napolitano and Monique Cotton that gives a good picture of what was going on.

 

Beyond the SR’s not using quality truthful information, the Napolitano/Cotton text messages were the result of Napolitano searching her private phone and providing the public records contained on her phone to Terri Pfister. I wonder why it has taken so long for others to do the same.

https://twitter.com/MCUBuff/status/653575785387704320/photo/1

https://twitter.com/MCUBuff/status/653568255395696640

https://examplepro.me/2015/10/19/lets-start-with-the-cottonnapolitano/

 

IS THERE ANY OUESTION WHY THE SPOKESMAN REVIEW WILL NOT LET ME COMMENT IN THEIR PUBLIC COMMENTS SECTION?

 

THEY CONTINUE TO DELETE COMMENTS THAT REFERENCE ME IN ANY WAY MADE BY ANY POSTER. I MUST BE ONE HELL OF AN EMBARRASMENT FOR THEM!

 

I REPORT THE TRUTH, YOU DECIDE!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 thoughts on “YOU REALLY HAVE TO WONDER???

  1. You probably noticed that it was me that posted most of your earlier blog entry to the SR as I knew your link would get blown away almost immediately, as it did. Of course, they also deleted my post. I’m wondering just how what I posted violated the SR’s terms of use? And yes, it is obvious that you are causing them serious embarrassment. Keep up the good work 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I did notice! What is really sad is that the SR right now is like the SPD everybody is bucking for Grahams position when he retires soon. Leading the pack is Addy Hatch who had all the information on Straub in 2013 told the person that gave it to her (not me) the Brundt was going to do a story but she spiked it. The SR is just like the SPD and the SCSO reporters talk! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

Your Response Here:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s