THE RAINBOW GIRL LAWSUIT!!!

As I mentioned in my “IS IT ME” story THE RAINBOW GIRL made lawsuit threats against me after I politely requested she not use my name in the SR Comments Section. The Rainbow Girl is of course none other than Ms. Hilary Ohm of Colville, WA who goes by “Rosehips” in the SR Comments Section.

https://examplepro.me/2016/08/27/is-it-me/

hilary ohm poster

 

Unfortunately, Hilary continues to accuse me and seems to get a lot of enjoyment out of it so I thought I would give my readers an idea of just who she actually is.

Go Brian Go post

 

 

(Darn Navy Seals!)

 

Hilary, who I would consider an extreme liberal is constantly having word battles back and forth with the Conservatives that comment in the SR Section occasionally those battles get pretty vitriolic, on the other hand sometimes they are downright funny. One in particular I thought was funny was between her and Conservative David Bray (Semper Fi). The topic was kind of about government service and Hilary indicated she had served on some kind of a secret mission in the military while in Germany. When she was confronted about her DD-214 she said her DD-214 had been taken from her by the KGB.

 

Hilary Ohm, prior to becoming “Rosehips” used to comment on the SR Site and others using her now legal name Hilary Ohm, yet she complains about anonymity.

Hilary Ohm Disqus

Hilary Ohm anonymous

 

 

You might notice the “Riddler” comment in the image above. Just a tip for you “Riddler”, there is no anonymity on the internet, if you use the internet even kids can determine who you are, as well as your secrets. Even legally changing your name as Hilary did from Beth Ryan to Hilary Ohm won’t hide who you are.

Name Change 1

Name Change 2

 

 

IMO, there is nothing wrong with being a die-in-the-wool Liberal and supporting Liberal causes. The same is true for die-in-the-wool Conservatives. The problem as I see it is not being honest about who, you are, what you believe in, and taking the low road to support your ideology. Both sides do that, and we all know it.

 

In Hilary’s case as far as ideology goes it would be of little surprise to anyone that Hilary was a stanch Bernie Sanders supporter, and she advertised that fact.

Bernie Sanders Event

 

 

 

Another thing Hilary is deeply involved in “Citizens for A Clean Columbia” which is an advocacy group who advocate for a clean Columbia, I for one want the same for the Columbia I think we all want it clean. Good on you Hilary.

Corp CFACC 1

Corp CFACC 2

 

 

EPA has received a “Letter of Intent” from Citizens for a Clean Columbia to apply for technical assistance funding for this site. If you would like to work with Citizens for a Clean Columbia, or submit a joint application, contact Hilary Ohm, Chairperson, Citizens for a Clean Columbia, P.O. Box 172, Northport, WA 99157,

(509) 685-0933.

 

https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/f031ed61-cd64-4051-8280-3b6b52a034d0

 

 

One thing Hilary and I have in common is that we both have Blogs you can find Hilary’s here as well as some of the comments she has made:

http://blog.highwaterfilters.com/

http://ireport.cnn.com/people/rosehips

https://tonsofwash.wordpress.com/about/

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-220438

http://waterbuckpump.com/tag/hilary-ohm/

https://hikelighter.com/2013/07/21/sawyer-mini-filter-announced-for-fall-2013/

http://www.motherearthnews.com/nature-and-environment/water-pollution-water-filters-zbcz1401.aspx

 

***You might notice in this one that Hilary wants a clean Columbia, and also doesn’t like those poisons present in Girl Scout Cookies.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/02/04/girl.scout.cookie.ethics/index.html?eref=rss_latest&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_latest+%28RSS%3A+CNN+-+Most+Recent%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher

 

http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/03/10/budget.irpt/index.html?iref=24hours

 

 

This of course represents only a very small portion of what I know about Hilary Ohm that I thought I would share with my readers. When someone threatens you with a criminal complaint, or a lawsuit the best thing to do is to get to know your adversary including whether or not they are “Judgement Proof”, which most of my adversaries are.

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-does-judgment-proof-mean.html

 

Of course the word “Hypocrisy” has been thrown around about me recently, which doesn’t bother me, but when you look at people that are making every effort like Hilary, Andy Scheldt, and others are doing to try and torpedo my legitimate complaint against Mayor Condon and the City by contacting my lawyers and City Councilmembers about what a dastardly fellow I am, one has to wonder if they really understand what “Hypocrisy” actually is.

One thing I’ve noticed about these folks is that NOT ONE has the guts to face me or even give me a call, and in my view that says a lot!

Keep in mind that ALL of the things posted here are a matter of public record, which anyone, at anytime can easily find!

 

I may have more about my adversaries later, including Hilary, depending on the direction things take…but this is a good start.

 

 

I REPORT YOU DECIDE!!! 

 

 

IS IT ME???

The “UP VOTE OUTING BANDIT” …that is!

 

There is of course one way to find out, EITHER CRAP OR GET OFF THE POT, after being falsely accused of a crime by Sheila Chase and Andrew Scheldt, like most would, I sought legal advice and the suggestion was… to ask nicely for people to stop using my name, or the lawyers could send a letter. I opted to email Ms. Ohm directly. Thus I sent the email below to Ms. Hilary Ohm, who goes by “Rosehips” on the SR Site. As you can see from the image below it was a simple request. Hilary Ohm like all of the folks that comment on the SR Site has a huge internet and social media footprint so it was extremely easy to find her email address, even a 10-year-old kid could have found it, the same is true for all of the commenters on the SR site.

Me to Hilary Ohm

 

Ms. Ohm responded to me with this weird email which included a comment about someone’s wealth:

Hilary to Me 7 23

 

 

I subsequently responded back to Ms. Ohm here, with the same response I would give to anyone.

Me back to Hilary 7 26

Hilary responded with this email:

Hilary back to me 7 26

 

I ended the craziness with this:

Me to Hilary block

 

I do have a pretty high boiling point, but when I reach it watch out. I don’t mind people making fun of me on public websites like the SR and Facebook, saying such things as I’m in need of psychological help as “Riddler” suggests, or that “my problem” is alcohol, as Andrew Scheldt states.

Riddler off the tracks

Sled Breen Alcohol

I do however have a problem when people go out of their way to contact City Councilmembers, and the Center for Justice to defame my character. That requires some looking into.

Breean Beggs Knows

Sled sending to CFJ

 

Yes, I get screenshot copies almost daily now, and I do some of my own.

 

Since I have a lot of respect for Breean even supporting him in his run for Prosecutor and seat on the City Council, as well as interacting with him on some law enforcement issues, I thought I better check it out. So I sent him a copy of Andy’s public statements in the image above to Breean.

Me to Breean

 

***Note to “printsubscriber”: Actually my time other than Honey Dos is pretty well consumed with collating thousands upon thousands of pages of PRR documents in preparation for an upcoming case. Dumb of me probably to bother with this story.

Breean back to me

 

Me Back to Breean.

Me back to Breean all over town

 

Of course Andrew Lee Scheldt aka “Sled” and Sheila A Chase aka “Shelalal” both of whom are documented liars and have zilch as far as credibility is concerned always come up with something when they get caught. In this case here is Andy’s attempt at an out.

Sled mutual friend

Not to worry Andy, I’ll get a further clarification for you.

I will also note that I will be doing more stories here where I can provide documentation and evidence regarding both Sheila Chase and Andrew Scheldt, when my time isn’t so limited. Here because unlike the “UP VOTE OUTING BANDIT” I can provide the evidence. As a matter of fact, if I wanted to “OUT” anyone else I would do it right here on this Blog with all the evidence as most of the Commenters from the SR Comments Section are followers including Andy and Sheila. It isn’t nice to falsely accuse someone of a crime and you have to expect push back from the one falsely accused.

 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THE “BB CULT”?

 

The generally reasonable “stich” apparently posted this comment last night, and must have thought better of it. When I checked today the comment was edited.

stitch BB cult

 

I also have noted that the SR will generally delete derogatory comments which mention my name, although rather slowly most of the time…I wonder why?

 

So I would assume some folks feel I’m the leader of some kind of a “cult”, I’m not sure what “stitch” means but if “stitch” is referring to the folks that read my Blog…WELCOME TO MY CULT!

 

 

This will be the last time I deal with this subject with the exception of some possible clarifications, I have better things to do, so as the saying goes for some of you … “EITHER CRAP OR GET OFF THE POT!”

 

I REPORT YOU DECIDE!!!!

A FEW ANSWERS TO SOME QUESTIONS REGARDING MY CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY!!!

Complaint Link:

https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/7c009de1-c9ab-4d7a-a5f5-c5da79a7e266

 

WHY FILE THE CLAIM?

Let me first explain that I’m going to try and be a good client for my lawyers and be somewhat guarded. But I want to make it clear that my decision to purse this isn’t for any political reasons, I don’t have any specific political ideology. I’m not a Democrat, Republican, nor do I hold any other political alignment or ideology, I truly am an independent. I wanted to make sure that at least one person or organization, with standing stepped up and pursued the truth.

My sole purpose is to get to the truth, and as I have stated many times, in Spokane, unfortunately, the only way to get to the truth is through litigation where individuals can be deposed under oath, evidence obtained through the Court’s discovery process, and where a Judge can review claims of Attorney Client Privilege. The Otto Zehm Case is a perfect example, had the Center for Justice not agreed to help the Zehm family to purse litigation the truth never would have come out.

DOES THIS HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE RECALL?

Mayor Condon has recently blamed the recall efforts against him as politically motivated by Democrats, and the Center for Justice. I want to be absolutely clear my complaint has nothing to do with the recall efforts. Long before the recall effort was initiated or the Cappel Report was released I contacted the Center for Justice. That contact was on March 1st, 2016 and I asked if they would be interested in representing me in this matter. They did not come to me; I went to them!

 

WHY THE CENTER FOR JUSTICE?

The reason I reached out to the Center for Justice has nothing to do with any alignment I have with them, I disagree with the positions they take on a number of issues, but one I vehemently agree with is the need in this City for Independent Oversight. I have never had any real involvement with the CFJ other then I asked them to take my case on as they have other cases. Since they aren’t involved in any way with the recall, it only made sense.

 

ARE YOU IN IT FOR THE MONEY?

Undoubtedly someone will suggest that I’m in it for the money. Nothing could be further from the truth and I fully intend to donate the proceeds of this case to groups that advocate for Independent Oversight?

 

DID THE LEVEL OF SCRUTINY YOUR PRR RECEIVED FROM MAYOR CONDON, NANCY ISSERLIS, TERESA SANDERS AND OTHERS AT CITY HALL SURPRISE YOU?

I wasn’t the least bit surprised. Based on my past experience with earlier Public Records Requests I had submitted, which provided a good picture of how City Hall handles these things, it was not a surprise. But that is an area I won’t get into at this point.

 

DO YOU BELIEVE PUBLIC RECORDS WERE WITHHELD FROM YOU UNTIL AFTER MAYOR CONDON’S RE-ELECTION BID?

Yes, I do, and I believe the Cappel Report makes that clear. I don’t want to get into any detail but the first response to my PRR, which was on September 29th 2015, made it clear to me that it was going to be a battle to get responsive regards, prior to the election, or anytime in the near future.

 

HOW FAR ARE YOU WILLING TO GO WITH YOUR COMPLAINT?

I’m willing to go to the extent necessary to get to the truth.

 

 

***I will be happy to answer any questions you might have that I feel can without jeopardizing the litigation, so please feel free to ask by commenting here.

 

 

 

I REPORT YOU DECIDE!!!