People are starting to notice that “Sled” (Andrew Scheldt) is the perpetual victim when any issue comes up on the SR, from his car being stolen several times, his house burglarized, his credit cards compromised, people picking on him because he is a “Jew” (not), and on and on. In Sled’s latest rendition of being a victim he is being victimized by “someone who is off their rocker”…that in Sled’s view is ME.
In the comment by Sled below you can see his deep concern for my wiretapping and bugging of the SR, he should be far more concerned about the bugs I have running in his residence, and the Stingray I have set to monitor his phone.
Sled of course exaggerates the number of fraudsters I will be providing information on stating there are “5” when in reality there are only three….Andrew Scheldt, Sheila Chase, and Chuck Tingstad, all of whom are complete frauds, and the type of individuals liberals if they knew the truth would not align themselves with. The same way conservatives would not want to align themselves with frauds. So I am actually helping liberals out in exposing complete frauds.
Although I am limiting background information to three people I reserve the right to go beyond that if Andrew pulls anyone else into his crazy world and they are complete frauds like he, Chase, and Tingstad. Keep that in mind 56traveler the next time you up vote Andrew.
Has anyone ever noticed that Sled is the only one in the SR comments that is allowed to use my name without the comment being deleted, and is allowed to make false claims about me time and time again…there is a reason for that and it deals directly with my FOIA regarding the Cotton/Straub issue. If folks noticed my FOIA deals with the SR spiking the Cotton/Straub story until after the election which is beginning to look like what happened…but we shall see. That is why Addy Hatch chose to ban me and the only reason.
Andrew along with Shelia falsely accused me of committing a crime…for that alone frauds must be exposed so others don’t suffer the same.
The City is playing the usual FOIA game and here is part on the last installment.
This is also to advise you that additional records responsive to this portion (transfer of Monique Cotton from the Spokane Police Department) of your request, as well as the portion of your request for “formal or informal complaints made by or against Frank G. Straub or Monique Cotton” have been located. With respect to these records, we have provided third-party notification to affected parties and are allowing them an opportunity if they so wish and at their own expense to enjoin the City’s release of these records. If no injunction is received preventing the release of the records by the provided deadline of November 30, 2015, we will make the records available to you on the following day, December 1, or as soon thereafter as possible.
The third parties that have a right to object are of course the Spokesman Review as you can see from my FOIA request below I requested text message and email interaction from a number of SR folks.
RE: Your October 17, 2015, request
I am in the process of working with Angie Napolitano to obtain additional information as it relates to the text messages that have been provided to you. If you are not really interested in obtaining the additional information as it relates to Ms. Napolitano’s text messages, please let me know at your earliest convenience. Otherwise, I will plan to follow up with you with respect to the additional information by October 30.
Terri L. Pfister, MMC | City of Spokane | City Clerk
808 W. Spokane Falls Boulevard, Spokane, WA 99201-3342
509.625.6354 | fax 509.625.6217 | email@example.com
As you requested here are some additional search criterion for emails during the time frame I listed.
(Cotton AND Fire Department) or (Monique AND Fire Department) or (Cotton AND Park Department) or Monique AND Park Department) or (Frank AND Monique) or (Straub AND Cotton) (Monique AND Condon) or (Spokesman AND Cotton) or (Hatch and Straub) or (Hatch and Straub) or (Graham AND Cotton) or (Graham and Monique) or (Graham and Straub) 0r (Monique AND Transfer) or (Review and Cotton) or (Cotton AND Salary) or (Monique and Pay)
Please pay special attention to emails to and from the following:
As you can see for the first time someone is willing to take on the SR, City, and SPD….so maybe Sled is right I am off my rocker! 🙂
I will be interesting to see if I’m in court with the SR with them objecting to the publics right to know.